Let and . Compute .
Show the worked solution
Answer: 8
I work from the inside out: , then . The inner function always fires first — the notation hands 's output to .
OMPT drill — Functions
Chaining functions and undoing them. The mechanical part is easy; the traps are order of composition and domain after inversion. Attempt each problem before opening the solution; the notation only becomes automatic by writing it yourself.
Tested inOMPT-AOMPT-BOMPT-DOMPT-F
Composition chains two machines together: means run through first, then feed whatever comes out into . Read it inside-out, always. The notation is the only hard part, because and look like siblings and are usually completely different functions; order matters in composition the way it matters in getting dressed: socks then shoes is not shoes then socks.
An inverse function runs a machine backwards. Where takes 3 to 11, the inverse takes 11 back to 3. Finding it is a two-step ritual; swap the roles of input and output, then solve for the new output, and checking it is even easier: composing a function with its inverse must give you plainly back. If simplifies to anything else, one of the two is wrong, and the check just paid for itself.
Let and . Compute .
Answer: 8
I work from the inside out: , then . The inner function always fires first — the notation hands 's output to .
What is the inverse of ?
Answer: A —
I write , swap the roles of and , and solve: gives , so . The inverse undoes the original in reverse order: first undo the division (multiply by 2), then undo the (subtract 7). Check: and .
Let and . Compute .
Answer: 6
Inside out again: , then . Compare with the other order: . Same two functions, different answer — order is everything in composition.
Suppose has an inverse and . Which statement must be true?
Answer: A —
says: the input that sends to 5 is 2. In other words, . Inverse functions swap input and output; each fact about is the mirrored fact about .
A student finds the inverse of . Step 1: swap variables, . Step 2: solve for : . Step 3: so . Which step contains the error?
Answer: Step 2
The swap in Step 1 is correct. In Step 2 the student divided by 2 first and then subtracted the full 6, but the 6 must be removed before dividing: gives . A composition check exposes the slip: with the student's formula, but . With the correct inverse, .
Let for . Compute .
Answer: 7
First . Then . We are back where we started — this function is its own inverse, so applying it twice returns every input unchanged.